<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The fence between Church and State</title>
	<link>http://robertsutton.net/blog/2007/10/01/the-fence-between-church-and-state/</link>
	<description>The Μετακόσμια Weltanschauung</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jemimapuddleduck</title>
		<link>http://robertsutton.net/blog/2007/10/01/the-fence-between-church-and-state/#comment-162</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://robertsutton.net/blog/2007/10/01/the-fence-between-church-and-state/#comment-162</guid>
					<description>Eh, I just miss the fence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, I just miss the fence.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: thimscool</title>
		<link>http://robertsutton.net/blog/2007/10/01/the-fence-between-church-and-state/#comment-143</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 03:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://robertsutton.net/blog/2007/10/01/the-fence-between-church-and-state/#comment-143</guid>
					<description>Fagetaboudit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fagetaboudit.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: raspootin</title>
		<link>http://robertsutton.net/blog/2007/10/01/the-fence-between-church-and-state/#comment-141</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://robertsutton.net/blog/2007/10/01/the-fence-between-church-and-state/#comment-141</guid>
					<description>Just so I understand correctly, are you saying: 

The City gives you a specific license to put your art on that particular fence, you pay the city for the privilege, but at anytime the head priest can tell you that your artwork is not to his liking and &quot;kick&quot; you off the fence?

Obviously sales taxes should go to the city and state, but are you suggesting that the Priest could potentially blackmail you into giving him additional funds for being on the church fence and or encourage you to renounce your atheism?

That would not be ethical or legal of the priest.  

 If I have it straight, good thing you are not going to be reliant on the fence for much longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so I understand correctly, are you saying: </p>
<p>The City gives you a specific license to put your art on that particular fence, you pay the city for the privilege, but at anytime the head priest can tell you that your artwork is not to his liking and &#8220;kick&#8221; you off the fence?</p>
<p>Obviously sales taxes should go to the city and state, but are you suggesting that the Priest could potentially blackmail you into giving him additional funds for being on the church fence and or encourage you to renounce your atheism?</p>
<p>That would not be ethical or legal of the priest.  </p>
<p> If I have it straight, good thing you are not going to be reliant on the fence for much longer.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.665 seconds -->
